• SOLAR NOON
  • INFO
  • 2024
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
SOLAR NOON
2024
2018
2017
2016
INFO
Jordan Tate

Picturesque Snot: Polemics of the Landscape

4.6.18 - 4.27.18
(Text below excerpted from an ongoing exchange between Dr. Abigail Susik and Jordan Tate)

Are you finding that the main difference you experience with landscape is about being in that space as a photographer, or about the space itself as separate from you, or about the remainder of that space as it is secured in the photographic image? I'm asking because I feel like all three of those modes of relating to landscape could be quite different. Since I wasn't there in the snow with you that day, I find that I am for the most part clutching the final document, the remainder of your time, the photograph itself, in my search for signs of a sense of space and difference in the landscape as it is rendered frozen, two-dimensional and black and white in your shots. One of the things that I find relieving about these two images that you sent is that they are comparably more free of coded signs than most other images I deal with during my day, such as reproductions of works of art, news images, photographs of faces coded with signifying expressions. The landscape is not attempting to communicate with me in the photograph, although I suppose it could be communicating in some manner with something (not me).

But for you, you were there in the space with your binary vision of two eyes, and your mono-perspective of the camera lens, and the snowy escarpment itself. Was the landscape most real in your lens or in your eyes, or was there no difference? I feel like this question probably sounds unclear. What I mean is, how did you see the landscape and what was it like for you?

By the way, I liked your typo "picturesque snot." It seemed very apropos. It's like as soon as you captured the photographic image, the coolness of the place, its difference as land, was suddenly transmuted into gooey snot as "picturesque" enframed picture- landscape.

// Dr. Abigail Susik

Fresh perspective on one’s own assumptions are always painful and productive. I think (to finally answer your question) the difference of the landscape and my role in it is apart from the photograph. The photograph is almost a record of having-been-there and something to share as an aesthetic experience (a massive separation from my earlier practice). So when thinking about how I relate to the landscape as a part of my practice I'm not able to place my practice at a single point, the closest is the first, but I would suggest that for my process it is more the being in the landscape as a person that is most important, not primarily as a photographer (although admittedly, I always do take the 4x5). That said, I think your third paradigm is also accurate - what I have is the remainder (or remnants) of the land that has been "scaped" and therefore made object and other. This gets to the question of the difference between land and landscape (as I see it) - land exists and landscape is observed but it can't exist as landscape (or you can't be sure of its existence as picturesque enough to be a landscape) until you observe it. It's Schrödinger's Landscape.

Really though, it is also a manifestation of a powerful Weltschmertz that I am not alone in feeling. The world we live in is not the world I expected or knew. Everything is just a little bit fucked, but also strangely hopeful. It is perfectly described as picturesque snot. You are my hero for that one.

// Jordan Tate
All Vectors Point to This

collaboration with Localhost Gallery

3.16.18 - 3.30.18
All Vectors Point To This is a collaborative exhibition between two artist-run, non-commercial galleries who occupy both physical and digital space. In lieu of displaying any individual artist’s work, IRL and Localhost have chosen to turn the gallery itself into the spectacle - in doing so the emphasis falls onto the container rather than the contents. IRL has fed information and imagery to Localhost to fill its space, and vice versa. By employing reflexivity and experimental modes of production, this collaboration aims to define the status of this emerging sect of DIY ethos and to forge new territory in the slippage between physical and digital space.
Presence

Kara Gut

2.2.18 - 2.23.18
Presence is a collection of works that contemplate the connection between bodies across multiple platforms.
Each piece is an attempt at intimacy in the form of limited reception, reaching for a fantasy that clips when grasped.
What results is an investigation of game-space, faux-medievalism, and a solitudinous performativity for the screen.
Notes on Today from Tomorrow

Esmeralda Kosmatopoulos

Eva Papamargariti

Theo Triantafyllidis

Natalie Yiaxi

curated by CM Turner

01.05.18 - 01.26.18
Featuring Greek artists Esmeralda Kosmatopoulos, Eva Papamargariti, Theo Triantafyllidis, and Natalie Yiaxi, Notes on Today from Tomorrow presents turns of language, explorations of action, and confrontations of being. Employing tragicomedy and allusions to fate and prophecy, these video-based works borrow from the lexicon of Greek storytelling to address the overlap of physical and digital phenomena in contemporary quotidian life.

When discussing “Greek Art,” the colloquial forms familiar to most Americans, (tropes of tiled mosaics, or narrative Attic vases, or marbled busts) are not present in this show; in their place stand contemporary works by contemporary Greek-born artists, all of who are now living outside of mainland Greece. This exhibition exemplifies the work these artists do in imbuing new media with classical ideas, allowing familiar themes to emerge unexpectedly from foreign bodies, like so many warriors stuffed inside a wooden horse.
Jordan Tate

Picturesque Snot: Polemics of the Landscape

4.6.18 - 4.27.18
(Text below excerpted from an ongoing exchange between Dr. Abigail Susik and Jordan Tate)

Are you finding that the main difference you experience with landscape is about being in that space as a photographer, or about the space itself as separate from you, or about the remainder of that space as it is secured in the photographic image? I'm asking because I feel like all three of those modes of relating to landscape could be quite different. Since I wasn't there in the snow with you that day, I find that I am for the most part clutching the final document, the remainder of your time, the photograph itself, in my search for signs of a sense of space and difference in the landscape as it is rendered frozen, two-dimensional and black and white in your shots. One of the things that I find relieving about these two images that you sent is that they are comparably more free of coded signs than most other images I deal with during my day, such as reproductions of works of art, news images, photographs of faces coded with signifying expressions. The landscape is not attempting to communicate with me in the photograph, although I suppose it could be communicating in some manner with something (not me).

But for you, you were there in the space with your binary vision of two eyes, and your mono-perspective of the camera lens, and the snowy escarpment itself. Was the landscape most real in your lens or in your eyes, or was there no difference? I feel like this question probably sounds unclear. What I mean is, how did you see the landscape and what was it like for you?

By the way, I liked your typo "picturesque snot." It seemed very apropos. It's like as soon as you captured the photographic image, the coolness of the place, its difference as land, was suddenly transmuted into gooey snot as "picturesque" enframed picture- landscape.

// Dr. Abigail Susik

Fresh perspective on one’s own assumptions are always painful and productive. I think (to finally answer your question) the difference of the landscape and my role in it is apart from the photograph. The photograph is almost a record of having-been-there and something to share as an aesthetic experience (a massive separation from my earlier practice). So when thinking about how I relate to the landscape as a part of my practice I'm not able to place my practice at a single point, the closest is the first, but I would suggest that for my process it is more the being in the landscape as a person that is most important, not primarily as a photographer (although admittedly, I always do take the 4x5). That said, I think your third paradigm is also accurate - what I have is the remainder (or remnants) of the land that has been "scaped" and therefore made object and other. This gets to the question of the difference between land and landscape (as I see it) - land exists and landscape is observed but it can't exist as landscape (or you can't be sure of its existence as picturesque enough to be a landscape) until you observe it. It's Schrödinger's Landscape.

Really though, it is also a manifestation of a powerful Weltschmertz that I am not alone in feeling. The world we live in is not the world I expected or knew. Everything is just a little bit fucked, but also strangely hopeful. It is perfectly described as picturesque snot. You are my hero for that one.

// Jordan Tate
All Vectors Point to This

collaboration with Localhost Gallery

3.16.18 - 3.30.18
All Vectors Point To This is a collaborative exhibition between two artist-run, non-commercial galleries who occupy both physical and digital space. In lieu of displaying any individual artist’s work, IRL and Localhost have chosen to turn the gallery itself into the spectacle - in doing so the emphasis falls onto the container rather than the contents. IRL has fed information and imagery to Localhost to fill its space, and vice versa. By employing reflexivity and experimental modes of production, this collaboration aims to define the status of this emerging sect of DIY ethos and to forge new territory in the slippage between physical and digital space.
Presence

Kara Gut

2.2.18 - 2.23.18
Presence is a collection of works that contemplate the connection between bodies across multiple platforms.
Each piece is an attempt at intimacy in the form of limited reception, reaching for a fantasy that clips when grasped.
What results is an investigation of game-space, faux-medievalism, and a solitudinous performativity for the screen.
Notes on Today from Tomorrow

Esmeralda Kosmatopoulos

Eva Papamargariti

Theo Triantafyllidis

Natalie Yiaxi

curated by CM Turner

01.05.18 - 01.26.18
Featuring Greek artists Esmeralda Kosmatopoulos, Eva Papamargariti, Theo Triantafyllidis, and Natalie Yiaxi, Notes on Today from Tomorrow presents turns of language, explorations of action, and confrontations of being. Employing tragicomedy and allusions to fate and prophecy, these video-based works borrow from the lexicon of Greek storytelling to address the overlap of physical and digital phenomena in contemporary quotidian life.

When discussing “Greek Art,” the colloquial forms familiar to most Americans, (tropes of tiled mosaics, or narrative Attic vases, or marbled busts) are not present in this show; in their place stand contemporary works by contemporary Greek-born artists, all of who are now living outside of mainland Greece. This exhibition exemplifies the work these artists do in imbuing new media with classical ideas, allowing familiar themes to emerge unexpectedly from foreign bodies, like so many warriors stuffed inside a wooden horse.